Navigating the Virtual Linguistic Landscape: A Multifaceted Journey
Published: 2024-01-10
Page: 46-54
Issue: 2024 - Volume 7 [Issue 1]
Abdulaziz Abdullah Alenezi *
Newcastle University, English Language Instructor at Ministry of Education, England.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The virtual linguistic landscape is a testament to the globalization of communication. It reflects the amalgamation of diverse languages, serving as a digital agora where cultures converge and languages intermingle. In the virtual linguistic landscape, one can observe a myriad of languages, ranging from dominant global languages like English, Chinese, and Spanish, to regional or minority languages, along with various scripts, emojis, and symbols that contribute to the tapestry of online communication. The concept of the virtual linguistic landscape (VLL) emerged with the advent and widespread use of the internet, particularly during the rise of social media and online communication platforms. The linguistic landscape traditionally refers to the visible language or multilingual signage in public spaces within a physical environment, like streets, storefronts, and public transportation.
Keywords: Virtual linguistic landscape, cultural shifts, globalization, metamorphosis
How to Cite
References
Barbero A. Technology and literacy: Effectiveness over efficiency (Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Sacramento); 2020.
Bruggeman B, Hidding K, Struyven K, Pynoo B, Garone A, Tondeur J. Negotiating teacher educators’ beliefs about blended learning: using stimulated recall to explore design choices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2022;100–114 Available:https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7175
Bustard JR, Hsu DH, Fergie R. Design thinking innovation within the quadruple helix approach: a proposed framework to enhance student engagement through active learning in digital marketing pedagogy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2022;1–16.
Chen Y. Exploring inquiry learning and facilitation in technology-enhanced classrooms: A multidimensional investigation (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University); 2023.
Dudenhoffer CM. Digital identity and digital literacy: examining students’ abilities to evaluate information (Doctoral dissertation, St. Thomas University); 2020.
Kim J, Maloney EJ. Learning innovation and the future of higher education. JHU Press; 2020.
Lan GS, Guo Q, Zhang Y, Kong XK, Zhong QJ. Macro-trends, technologies & practices and future scenarios affecting the higher education teaching and learning in the future: key points and considerations of the 2020 educause horizon report (teaching and learning edition). Open Education Research. 2020;26:27–39.
Pachêco-Pereira C, Senior A, Compton S, Vargas-Madriz L, Marín L, Watson E. Student response to a blended radiology course: a multi-year study in dental education. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2020;11(3) Available:https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.3.8263
Picciano AG. Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning. 2017;21(3):166–190. Available:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225
Picciano AG. Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Online Learning. 2019;13(1) Available:https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i1.1673
Setiyani R, Lianingsih S, Susilowati N. Using the blended learning to enhance students’ engagement and learning experience in taxation. Kne Social Sciences; 2020 Available:https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i6.6615.
Sinatoko Djibo BO, Horsey EM, Zhao S. Good innovation capacity, good eco-innovation performance? From firms innovation, learning capacity, and institutional environment. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2023;1–31.
Viebig C. Blended learning in entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review. Education + Training. 2022;64(4):533–558.
Wu D, Zhu S, Wang MQ. The integrative construction of students’ digital literacy cultivating system: Challenge, principle, and approach. China Educational Technology. 2022;426(07):43–49, 63.
Yang BN. Exploring e-learning experiences in a dynamic organizational learning environment: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of organizational e-learners in a multicultural consulting firm in Hong Kong (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University); 2019.
Ye L, Kuang M, Liu S. Ict self-efficacy, organizational support, attitudes, and the use of blended learning: An exploratory study based on English teachers in basic education. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13. Available:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941535
Zhang J, Chen Z. Exploring human resource management digital transformation in the digital age. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, (2023).1–17.
Zhang M, He X. A study on the adaptability of blended college English learning. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education. 2020;194(04):89–93+14.
Addy TM, et al. What inclusive instructors do: Principles and practices for excellence in college teaching; 2023. Francis.
Alam S, et al. Practice and principle of blended learning in ESL/EFL pedagogy: Strategies, techniques and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (online). 2022; 17.
Almulla M, Investigating important elements that affect students’ readiness for and practical use of teaching methods in higher education. Sustainability. 2022;15.
Alshahrani A, The impact of ChatGPT on blended learning: Current trends and future research directions. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 2023;7.
Baber WW, A Ojala, R Martinez, Effectuation logic in digital business model transformation: Insights from Japanese high-tech innovators. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2019; 26.
Bao W, Chen DC, J Wang, Research on online and traditional learning paradigm and teaching effectiveness in the post COVID-19 era. China Education Technology. 2021;6.
Boland B, Social capital and the diffusion of learning management systems: A case study. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2020;9.
Bouilheres F, et al. Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies. 2020;25.
Bruggeman B, et al. Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2021;48.
Byrka M, Blended learning strategy in teacher training programs. Information Technologies and Learning Tools. 2017; 62.
Castro R, Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies. 2019;24.
Chaeruman U, S Maudiarti, Quadrant of blended learning: A proposed conceptual model for designing effective blended learning. Jurnal Pembelajaran Inovatif. 2018;1.
Chaeruman U, Wibawa B, Syahrial Z. Determining the appropriate blend of blended learning: A formative research in the context of Spada-Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018;6.
Coylec K, et al, Blended learning for sexual health education: Evidence base, promising practices, and potential challenges. Journal of School Health. 2019;89.
Eggers JH, Oostdam R, Voogt J. Self-regulation strategies in blended learning environments in higher education: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;37.
Evans J, et al. Blended learning in higher education: Professional development in a hong kong university. Higher Education Research & Development. 2019;39.
Faloon G, From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020;68.
Feng X, Sun Y, Cao J. Blended learning in the Internet Plus era: Learning theories and pedagogical foundations. Distance Education in China. 2019;2.
Gao F, Hu JL. Review of blended-learning application in English teaching in China (2005–2021). Journal of Shaanxi University of Technology (social Sciences). 2022;40.
Handayani T, Maulida E, Sugiyanta L, Blended learning implementation and impact in vocational schools. Teknodika. 2020;18.
Hanna NK. Assessing the digital economy: Aims, frameworks, pilots, results, and lessons. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2020;9.
Hua WF, The study of digital literacy and English learner autonomy. Foreign Language Education. 2020;41.
Josua L, Sibanda T. Covid-19 triggered technology integration strategies for enhanced student engagement in blended learning. African Journal of Education and Practice. 2022;8.
Kaeophanuek S, Na-Songkhla J, Nilsook P. A learning process model to enhance digital literacy using critical inquiry through digital storytelling (cidst). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET). 2019;14.
Khachatryan GA. Instruction modeling: Developing and implementing blended learning programs. Oxford University Press; 2020.
Kintu MJ, Zhu C, Kagambe E. Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2017;14.
Laer S, J Elen, In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Education and Information Technologies. 2017;22.
Laer S, J Elen. Adults’ self-regulatory behaviour profiles in blended learning environments and their implications for design. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2020;25.
Lai M, Lam KM, Lim CP, Design principles for the blend in blended learning: A collective case study. Teaching in Higher Education.2016;21.
Maulida D, et al, A review of the blended learning as the model in improving students’ paragraph writing skills. Abjadia. 2022;7.
Mishra S, Tripathi AR, AI business model: An integrative business approach. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2021; 10.
Qin HX, Du XH, Review and prospect of foreign online higher education research-based on bibliometric analysis of 16 SSCI journals (2010–2021). Education and Examinations. 2022;05.
Rasheed RA, Kamsin A, Abdullah NA, An approach for scaffolding students peer-learning self-regulation strategy in the online component of blended learning. IEEE Access. 2021;9.