A Socio-pragmatic Interpretation of the Communicative Silence in Asong Linus’ “The Crown of Thorns”
Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies,
,
Page 63-86
Abstract
The current consensus is that speech is an innate human capability, and in essence, provides instances by which speakers of a language use different speech acts to perform a variety of communicative functions. Where verbal language is often used, the non-verbal silence is regarded as inarticulate and uncommunicative. However, Asong Linus, for the most part in his novel ‘The Crown of Thorns’ [1], makes effective use of various forms of silence as a more powerful style of expression than words. Few writers have succeeded to use this technique of communicative silence effectively the way Asong Linus does in this novel, developing the plot, characters and his craftsmanship around this theme. In this paper, it is aimed to shed light on the significance of silence as an effective tool in communication that is no less powerful than speech or writing. The attempt is to show how verbal language sometimes fails as a means of communication in conveying the relevant message. Silence, therefore, is an important and complementary alternative for verbal language. How can one say a lot by not uttering a word and, yet create a greater impact is the objective of this investigation. To achieve this, various forms of silence elicited from the narration were collected after several readings of the novel, classified as different instances and analyzed. Particular attention is given to such instances as silence, short and long pauses employed by some major characters. To analyse the data, a combination of the critical Discourse analysis, Sperber and Wilson’s Relevance theory, and socio-pragmatics proved adequate and useful tools capable of highlighting on how speakers use these non-verbal signals to effectively communicate meaningfully within the Nweh social and cultural contexts. After the analysis, several findings were made; two major categories of silences were discovered, namely; the destructive or negative silences styled awkward, appalling, embarrassing, defensive, and fearful silences associated with deep feelings of frustration, barriers that shuts down communication, and constructive or positive silences that are golden, and which moves the conversational objectives forward establishing confidence, comfort, is reflective, peaceful, respectful, self-mastery. In conclusion, communicative silence is a helpful tool to enhance intentionality, by being silent, a speaker is expressing real deep intentions and emotional thoughts; indicate empathy, promote and maintain the existing social relationship. It further reveals that faced with a new challenge, silence is the first response that gives you a chance to reflect before you speak, increasing the likelihood that what you say and do will be on target, intelligent, and useful. In this text, silence is more powerful than words.
- Socio-pragmatics
- performative act
- communicative
- silence
- The Crown of Thorns
How to Cite
References
Smith Kurt. Silence: the secret communication tool. Psych Central. Scientifically Review; 2018.
Ibrahim Abu-Shahib. Forms and Functions of Communicative Silence in Jordan, Eskiyeni 27, Guz 2013; 147-153.
Sultan, Sabbar S. Silence and its discontents in Literature. Darasat, 2007; 34(3):682.
Gumperz, Jenny Cook- Gumperz, Studying language culture and society: Sociolinguistics or Linguistics. 2008: 12 (4) 532-545.
Leech G.N. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman; 1983.
Kieran O. Critical discourse analysis and language cognition. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press; 2003.
Mete Defne E. Silence: A Communicative act and a value in giving voice to silence. Brill. 2016; 65-73.
Teun Van Dijk, Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman; 1977.
Chomsky N. On cognitive structure and development: A reply to Piaget, Massioni Palmarini (ed.), Language and Learning. 1979; 35-52.
Labov W. Principles of linguistic changes: Social factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers; 2001.
Panksepp J. Toward a general psychobiological theory of emotions Behavioural and Brain sciences; 1982
Jaworski Adam. The power of silence: Social and pragmatic perspectives. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA. 1993; 15.
Erkman P. Movements with Precise Meanings. Journal of Communication. 1976; 26:14-16.
Farida Virani. Towards an Educated India: The power of silence in effective communication; 2013.
Nuray Alagözlü, Sevgi Sahin. Silence as a multi-purpose speech act in Turkish political discourse. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 3rd World Conference on Educational Series. 2011; 15:3008-3013.
Willie Mushing Tamfuh. The spoken language of the Wimbum ruling class, A study in discourse structure and function. Ph..D Thesis defended at the FALSS, University of Yaounde, Cameroon; 2007.
Brown P, Levinson S. Politeness: Some universals in language usage, Cambridge : CUP; 1987.
Watzlawick Paul, Janet Helmick Beavin, Don D. Jackson. Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton; 1967.
Janet Beavin, Bavelas. Research into the pragmatics of human communication. Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies. 1992; 11 (2):15- 29.
Saussure Ferdinand de. Course in general linguistics. London; 1913.
Austin J. L. How to do things with words. Oxford University Press; 1962.
Halliday MAK. The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse: With reference to Charles Darwin’s the origin of Species’. In Clotilde de Stasio, et al. (eds.) La Rappresentazione Verbale e Iconica: Valori Estetici E Funzionali. Atti del XI Congresso Nazionale dell’Associazzione Italiana di Anglistica, Bergamo, 24 e 25 Ottobre 1988. Guerini Studio (Milan), 1990;57–80.
Sperber Dan, Wilson Deirdre. Pragmatics. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. OUP, Oxford, 2005; 468-501.
Fasold Ralph. An introduction to language and linguistics, Cambridge University Press, UK; 2006.
He Ziran Ran Yongping. A review of relevance theory-The essentials of cognitive pragmatics; 1998.
Grice H. Paul. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1989.
-
Abstract View: 192 times
PDF Download: 106 times
