An Analysis of Images Based on Contrasts and Differences in Christian Themba Msimang’s Poetry

Jozi Joseph Thwala

Mission

Publication of high quality, high impact, peer-reviewed research papers and books.

Helpful

We are available for any assistance 24X7.

Fast and Transparent

We process all manuscripts fast and transparently, without compromising the peer-review standard.

Great Prices

We process all manuscripts fast and transparently, without compromising the peer-review standard.

An Analysis of Images Based on Contrasts and Differences in Christian Themba Msimang’s Poetry

Jozi Joseph Thwala

Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, , Page 38-48
Published 28 January 2021

Abstract

The objectives of this article are to mention and explicate the images that are differentiating and contrasting in Msimang’s poetry with an aim of highlighting the poetic meanings, themes and rhyme. The fundamental figures of speech that are identified, classified and analyzed are antithesis, irony, ambiguity and sarcasm. Their characteristics are that they all appear to contain conflicting or opposing ideas that are brought by words and phrases. The figures of speech that are based on comparisons, sound devices, exaggerations and understatement are implied. The use of these images brings about rich and varied styles with an inexhaustible sense of beauty. This is where we can detect the classic nature of the poets’ poetry. Images are used for poetic truth to compare animate and inanimate, big and small, good and bad objects in a more innovative and original way. The analysis concentrate on the expressive, referential, conative and poetic functions. The structuralism theory and approaches are adopted for this research work.

Keywords:

Antithesis
ambiguity
expressive function
referential function and sound devices.

How to Cite

Thwala, J. J. (2021). An Analysis of Images Based on Contrasts and Differences in Christian Themba Msimang’s Poetry. Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 4(1), 38-48. Retrieved from https://journalajl2c.com/index.php/AJL2C/article/view/30142

References

Swanepoel CF. African literature: Approaches and applications. Pretoria. Haum De Jager Tertiary; 1990.

Shiach D. The critical eye. Appreciation prose and poetry. New York: Thomas Nelson and Sons; 1984.

Walter B. Voice of the land. Wynberg: Ilima publishers and printers; 2015.

Thwala JJ. The employment of metaphor and simile in selected Siswati poetry. IRA- International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies. 2019;15(5).

Steinberg S. An introduction to communi cation studies. Cape Town: Juta Publi shers; 2011.

Fourie PJ. Introduction to communication media studies. Cape Town: Juta publishers. 2015;3.

Reaske CR. How to analyze poetry. New York: Monarch press; 1966.

Corbett EPJ. Classical rhetoric for the modern student. New York: Oxford University Press; 1965.

Thwala JJ, Khoza SS, Lusenga NM, Mayisela JJ. An Analysis of figures of speech in two selected languages: English and Siswati: International Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences Studies. 2019; 4(6).

Lutrin B, Pincus M. English handbook and study guide. Birnam Park: Berlut books; 2007.

Tucker B, Young J. English home language achieve. Cape Town: Pearson Publishers; 2013.

Scheffler B. Vistas of poetry. Alberton: Lectio Publishers; 2015.

Msimang CT. Iziziba zoThukela. Pretoria: Via Afrika Ltd; 1980.

Heese M, Lawton R. The owl critic - An Introduction to literary criticism. Elsies River: Nasou Ltd; 1988.

Msimang CT. UNodumehlezi kaMenzi. Pretoria: Bard Publishers; 1990.

Muecke DC. The compass of irony. London: Methuen Ltd; 1969.

CuddonJA. A dictionary of literary terms. Harmonds worth: Penguin Books; 1976.

Kaplan A, Kris E. Esthetic Ambiguity. International phenomenological society. Philosophy and phenomenological research. 1948; 8.

Abstract View: 178 times
PDF Download: 108 times