A Critical Stylistic Analysis of Naming and Describing in Nigeria Budget Speeches
Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies,
The study identified and analyzed naming and describing (a linguistic feature) of budget speeches by the state governors in Nigeria and also described the themes and content of the speeches. It also discussed the implications of the underlying political ideologies, inherent in the speeches and related the themes and the stylistic tools to the Nigerian socio-economic situation. This was with a view to characterizing budget speech discourse in Nigeria and advancing the knowledge on its socio-semantic imports. The study used both primary and secondary sources of data. The primary data were obtained from selected state governors’ budget speeches in Nigeria. Budget speeches delivered in 2012 were selected because it was the year the country experienced the removal of oil subsidy without its inclusion in the budget. The data for this research consisted of twelve (12) budget speeches delivered by state governors in the country. The secondary data were obtained from books, journal articles and the internet. The data were analysed using Jeffries’ critical stylistic approach. The results showed that the producers of budget speech used wide range of linguistic features to express their stand point exemplified by naming and describing. The choice of words also extends to pragmatic concepts. The analysis of the linguistic features and the description of the themes and content of the speeches revealed that all the budget speeches used for the study were named or christened one way or the other such as budget of restoration, budget of transformation, budget of rescue, among others. It was discovered that positive naming was extensively used to bring about positive attitude towards the situations in the country. The themes and the stylistic tools were also related to the socio-economic situation of the country. The study concluded that governors utilized various semantic devices to represent political ideologies in different slogans using naming and describing in the financial statements of their states. Also, critical stylistics helped to give useful insight into the political dynamics of budget speech presentation.
- linguistic feature
- political ideologies
- budget speech
- stylistic approach
How to Cite
Akinlo AE. Critical Review and Evaluation of 2012 National Budget. Australian Journal Business and Management Research. 2013;2(12).
Ogunyemi AO. A Thematic Review of the Essential Characteristics of Nigeria’s Federal Budget since 1954. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Reviews. 2012;3(2).
Ogunyemi AO. Federal budgets in Nigeria, 1954 – 1999: A history of the Processes, Policies and Problems”. University of Lagos PhD dissertation, Lagos; 2008.
Tella SA. The Nigerian 2012 Budget: A Critical Appraisal. Paper presented at the State of the Nation Roundtable organized by the Patriots for New Nigeria Initiative (PNNI) PNNI Secretariat, Abuja; 2012.
Ahmed S, Mahmoud R, Arif S. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Pakistan and Indian Budget Speeches. Journal of Economic Sustainable Development. 2014;5:7.
Wright D. Corpus Analysis of the 2015, UK Budget Speech; 2015.
Dorpar Maryam. A Critical Stylistic Analysis of Jashn-e Farkhonde Language Related Research. 2013;4(1).
Jeffries L. Critical Stylistics. The Power of English. London: Palgrave; 2010.
Adegbite W. A Course in Linguistic Stylistics (Mimeo) Unpublished Manuscript, Department of English, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria; 2012.
Crystal D, Davy D. Investigating English Style. London: Longman; 1969.
Adejare O. (1992) Language and Style in Soyinka: A Systemic Text Linguistic Study of a Literary Idiolect. Ibadan: Heinemann; 1992.
Ayeomoni M. Of Style and Stylistics”. LASU Encyclopaedia of the Arts. 2006;4(6):545-559.
Mistrik J. Stylistika. The Most Comprehensive Book on Slovak Stylistics; 1985.
Fowler, Fowler R. Power’ in Van Dijk (ed). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Academic Press; 1985;4:6-83.
Turner GW. Stylistics. Harmondsworth: Penguim Books Ltd; 1973.
Simpson P. Teaching Stylistics’ Analysing Cohesion and Narrative Structure’ Language and Literature. 2005;(1).
Carter & Simpson, Carter R, Simpson, P. Language, Discourse and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Discourse Analysis. London: Urwin Hyman Limited; 1989.
Halliday, et al. The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longman; 1964.
Simpson P. Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge; 2004.
Peter V. Stylistics Oxford University Press; 2002.
Olaosun IE. Language and Visuality in Selected Commodity Advertisements in Some Nigerian Newspapers’ Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Dept. of English, University of Ibadan; 2006.
Vacheck J. (ed). Praguiana: Some Basic and Less Known Aspects of the Prague Linguistic School. Vol. 12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing company; 1974.
Halliday, Halliday MAK. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Pergamon: Pergamon Press; 1965.
Halliday, Hassan, Halliday, M. and Hassan R. Language Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. London: Oxford University Press; 1985.
Halliday MAK. Categories of the Theory of Grammar”. Word. 1961;17(3):214- 292.
Wales K. Dictionary of Stylistics. London: Longman; 1989.
Bloor T, Bloor M. The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach. New York: Arnold Publishers; 1995.
Abstract View: 36 times
PDF Download: 14 times