Social-cultural Dynamics and Language Innovations: A Lexicology of COVID-19 Neologisms in Kiswahili

Safari Ntalala *

Department of Education, Kirinyaga University, Kenya.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, languages including Kiswahili had to adapt to a sudden influx of neologisms and scientific terms as health workers and governments strived to convey necessary advice to the public in order to contain spread of the disease. This article presents a sociolinguistic overview on social cultural dynamics and language innovations. It examines how social cultural undercurrents and society changes necessities language ingenuity to accommodate new morphological expressions, ideas and concepts. The focus is on COVID-19 neologisms in Kiswahili, their sense and usage during the coronavirus pandemic epoch as well as lexis’s re-structuring and practice in Kiswahili. The data was collected from articles, books, online Corpus and social media. Random sampling method was used in creating a corpus for analysis. The study involved establishing a list of common English terms related to COVID-19 and their equivalents in Kiswahili. The findings revealed that social-cultural dynamics impact language innovations as shown in many COVID-19 neologisms and expressions generated during the corona pandemic period in Kiswahili. The neological processes and language innovations involved include borrowing, lexical deviation, blending as well as calquering.

Keywords: COVID-19, lexicology, language innovation, neologisms, neological processes, socio-cultural dynamics


How to Cite

Ntalala, S. (2022). Social-cultural Dynamics and Language Innovations: A Lexicology of COVID-19 Neologisms in Kiswahili. Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 5(3), 276–285. Retrieved from https://journalajl2c.com/index.php/AJL2C/article/view/116

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asif M, Zhiyong D, Iram A, Nisar M. Linguistic analysis of neologism related to coronavirus (COVID-19). Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;4(1):100201.

Eble C. What is sociolinguistics?; 2005.

Available:http://www.pbs.org/speak/speech/sociolinguistics/sociolinguistics/.

McArthur T. Oxford companion to the English language. Oxford Press: New York; 1992.

Anissa Z. COVID-19 telescoping and neologisms. International Journal of Arts and Social Science. 2020;3(4).

Muhammad Asif, Deng Zhiyong, Anila Iram, Maria Nisar. Linguistic analysis of neologism related to coronavirus (COVID-19), Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2021;4(1).

Wolfgang K. Lexicology and Lexicography; in International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition); 2015.

Jones M, Singh I. Exploring Language Change. NY: Routledge; 2005.

Trudgill, Peter. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

Mantiri, Oktavian. Factors affecting language change. SSRN Electronic Journal; 2010,

Available:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2566128

Katermina V, Yachenko E. Axiology of covid-19 as a linguistic phenomenon in English mass media discourse. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 2020;8:59-67.

DOI: 10.4236/ajc.2020.82005

Tan, Kim Hua, Woods, Peter, Azman, Hazita, Abdullah, Imran Ho, Hashim, Ruzy Suliza, Rahim, Hajar Abdul, Idrus, Mohd Muzhafar, Said, Nur Ehsan Mohd, Lew, Robert, Kosem, Iztok. Covid-19 insights and linguistic methods. Language Linguistics Literature-the Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 2020;26(2):1-23.

Labov W. Principles of linguistic change. Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell. Lucida M. (2005). Communication and culture: The meaning of neologisms as marker of culture and technology. Unpublished master‘s thesis. York University, Canada. 1994;1.

Trudgill P. ‘Dialect contact, dialectology and sociolinguistics’, in K. Bolton and H. Kwok (eds), Sociolinguistics today: International perspectives. London: Routledge; 1992.

Chris Sinha. Language And Other Artifacts: Socio-Cultural Dynamics of Niche Construction; 2015.

Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283513223

Crystal D. Language and internet. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK; 2001.

Agha A. The social life of a cultural value. Language and Communication. 2003; 23:231–273.

Greenhill, Simon J. Demographic correlates of language diversity. In Bowern, C. & Bethwyn, E. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, New York: Routledge. 2014; 557–578.

Khan M. Neologisms in urdu a linguistic investigation of urdu media. Language in India. 2013;13(6).

Vago S. Social change (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2004.

Aduda K. A relevance theoretical analysis of dholuo neologism. Unpublished masters thesis. University of Nairobi, Kenya; 2013.

Karũrũ W. Borrowing and communication in language: The impact of morphological adaptation processes. International Journal of Education and Research. 2013;1(9).

Arokoyo B. Unlocking morphology. Ilorin: Chridamel Books; 2017.

Renner V. Lexical blending as wordplay. In A. Zirker & E. Winter-Froemel (Eds.), Wordplay and metalinguistic / metadiscursive reflection: Authors, contexts, techniques, and meta-reflection. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. 2015a;119–133.